Minus 3,567 points for this guy.
« What the Other Eight Supremes Got Sandra Day for A Retirement Gift | Main | Velcome! »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83456851869e200d83489346d69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference We Can Pick 'Em:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Financing My Graduation Party
- Law.Enotes.Com
Law Resources for Law Students law.enotes.com has the information you need. Case analysis, legal definitions, and much more.
Other Links
AOLIM
- Praxxix
WTF?
Posted by: Mandy | August 24, 2005 at 11:32 AM
um, you know, for such a bright guy, it's odd that he's "conceded." i mean, dang, why quit? maybe if he wasn't so fucking conceited.
Posted by: wooflaw | August 24, 2005 at 12:38 PM
maybe that was his way of conceding that he's a full-of-shit dumbass.
Posted by: jason sanford | August 24, 2005 at 12:54 PM
Yeah, right. We've already got our offers out & that loozer, lier got one. NOT.
Posted by: Botox | August 24, 2005 at 01:17 PM
Good job on picking that guy Wings.
Posted by: Reckless Murder | August 24, 2005 at 03:13 PM
Not just the spelling problem (but hey, I can't spell worth a danm either), but he actually wants to work in Dallas. That's just nuts.
Posted by: Fall Downstairberg | August 24, 2005 at 05:11 PM
well I have a GPA over 164, so piss on him.
Posted by: | August 24, 2005 at 07:17 PM
you guys aren't talking about me are you? i really think it's low that you pick on people just because they are inquisitive by nature. i mean, if a tree fell in the forest and a beaver bet a chipmunk that it didn't make any noise but then it did would that be a viable contract. Just saying.
paul
Posted by: paul | August 24, 2005 at 11:35 PM
What a jerk. Good job on picking this dude.
Posted by: MW | August 25, 2005 at 04:13 AM
Paul, you are an idiot. Everyone knows that betting is against public policy and cannot create an enforceable contract. Duh. That's not inquisitive, that's being stupid and not doing the reading. Douche.
Posted by: Reckless Murder | August 25, 2005 at 07:30 AM
Oh, and everyone gets offers. You have to nail a partner's spouse in order not to.
http://anonymouslawyer.blogspot.com/2005/05/first-round-of-new-summer-associates.html
Posted by: Fall Downstairberg | August 25, 2005 at 08:01 AM
The guy was looking for information ananymously on greedy associates and he spelled a word wrong--and that somehow makes him an idiot and a back choice for TLR?
Posted by: Ian | August 25, 2005 at 09:34 AM
Oh shit. It was actually Ian. He must be interviewing as a 3L. Sorry, dude.
And, for future reference, the question "If you could go anywhere to litigate in Dallas, where would it be?" would have gotten the job done.
Concision. Concisity. Concisivenesslishness.
Posted by: wingsandvodka | August 25, 2005 at 11:12 AM
And that is why you are EIC, Wings.
Posted by: Reckless Murder | August 25, 2005 at 11:21 AM
Fall Downstairberg, you know Anonymous Lawyer is fictional, right?
Posted by: | August 25, 2005 at 12:30 PM
Yeah, well put it this way. I didn't get a fictional offer at Anonymous Lawyer's firm. Can't say it was entirely worth it.
Posted by: Fall Downstairberg | August 25, 2005 at 01:17 PM
I know that guy. No, really.
Posted by: Seriously | August 25, 2005 at 04:07 PM
omg i know this guy. and, yes, he sounds just like this in person. 2400 my ASS.
Posted by: Retching | August 26, 2005 at 03:43 PM
Who is the guy?
Posted by: | September 03, 2005 at 06:26 PM